xox
-
Posts
7561 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
.thumb.jpg.b5aade16576d2ae875dd83cc3f0df15b.jpg)
.thumb.png.69ef2e71f1f9f9110a2d11366b5d074e.png)
xox's Achievements
-
his name is robert paulson his name is robert paulson his name is robert paulson his name is robert paulson 😞
-
Oh maan i tried! And I failed! All i got in return from you was a total misunderstanding and respond that my english is bad; I admit i was my fault too. 2ndly, I’m responding to your posts bc im a polite guy (I still regret not answering some posts on watmm, was probably seen as impolite back then and don’t want to repeat that again) but sorry i have no more energy nor will to proceed with this topic.
- 131 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- composition
- 12-tone
- (and 2 more)
-
Still, imo we’re talking about different things imo ☮️
-
Ok, that’s one of the points we differ, and that’s fine also, i was firstly specifically referring to the afx quote p.s. not sure if i was understood here but by aesthetics of music I don’t mean in a plain decorative sense or personal taste (as you say) but more as a branch of philosophy Totally agree! I just believe there’s more to that ✌️ ☮️
-
I’m sincerely starting to question my mind bc aesthetics of music is something i like to think about and i extremely rarely find someone who understands me on the net or irl (while im trying to monitor my intellectual narcissism and my probable belief that im soooo fakn special and nobody understands my specialness), so rarely that im struggling to read your post as supportive but ill try to stretch in the positive direction and just say thank you bro! Thank you 🙏
- 131 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- composition
- 12-tone
- (and 2 more)
-
imo it’s not my english, which is far from ideal, especially when im trying to write about philosophical things but same happens when i speak about these things in my own language; some ppl get it immediately (bc they’ve been seeing things the way you see already) some don’t, and im not talking about who’s right or not, who’s smart or not, it’s not about that; it’s just the topic is extremely difficult and at this level of abstraction, it’s really hard to explain things to someone who sees things differently/opposite to you Where i see the problem is that im talking about the philosophy (metaphysics and aesthetics) of music and art while you and vkxwz are talking about methods, knowledge and processes; totally different dimensions and that’s why we can’t understand each other …same happened in that other thread, that’s why i just gave up, just bc I couldn’t explain myself, whatever reason might be, my english or our extreme differences and misunderstandings (bc of those differences)
- 131 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- composition
- 12-tone
- (and 2 more)
-
Can’t you just explain your own words that i bolded for you?! you’re responding to me without any logic! Again! What the hell the state of mind before you actually imagine music (the state of mind that’s responsible for imagining and later making a certain kind of music) {{the things i was talking about}} has to do with being able or not to “replicate what you hear”? [[that was your respond]] By “replicate” did you mean to actualize your imagined music into the physical world? your emotional state is about as relevant as your opinion on jiu-jitsu if you're unable to replicate what you hear. it won't dictate shit imo
-
Me “Im not talking about imagining music but about the cognitive and emotional state before you imagine the music, the state that dictates type of music you want to imagine/make! That “to want” phase comes before any other stage, before making music (in your mind or actually/physically)… so, we’ve returned to “the will” argument …oh no!” Yo “your emotional state is about as relevant as your opinion on jiu-jitsu if you're unable to replicate what you hear. it won't dictate shit imo.” Me “You hear where?! You can hear your emotions and thoughts?”
-
You hear where?! You can hear your emotions and thoughts?
-
Im not talking about imagining music but about the cognitive and emotional state before you imagine the music, the state that dictates type of music you want to imagine/make! That “to want” phase comes before any other stage, before making music (in your mind or actually/physically)… so, we’ve returned to “the will” argument …oh no! 🙂
-
his music more and more reminds me of arca's
-
yes, but you...i guess, you first want to ''entertain yourself / make you feel the way you want to feel'' in a known or unknown way, right?
-
Isn’t it that in his example the “what you want to hear” part comes first?
-
This should be good
-
aaa shit! he was relatively young! anyone knows what happened?
