Jump to content
IGNORED

Slipknot - Slipknot


Guest A/D

Recommended Posts

Slipknot.jpg

 

ok, I know chen and like 1 other person will read this, but whatever. I decided to write a big long piece on why I like this album so much. tl;dr/lots of too long sentences below.

 

 

 

Slipknot's self-titled album is my favorite metal album ever.

 

What makes this album so much fun to listen to is its great attention to composition. Each song is not a series of sections, it's a smart mix of ebb and flow. Nobody stays with one idea for more than a couple of bars, and if they do, it's because the song has been built up enough for the catharsis of repetition.

 

Like long-form classical stuff, the texture and structure of the whole disc is implicated in the earliest pieces. In the first few songs, we get breakneck speeds, syncopated, caught off-guard and rapidly changed up. In their high points, though, we get straight rhythms, more melody, energy channeled and pinpointed. This second group of elements opens up over the course of the disc, as songs become longer, more melodic, more attached to their themes, more traditional in structure.

 

What I like so much about it is that the transitions are cellular. Even as songs tend towards one extreme or the other, they incorporate elements of both seamlessly. They are all made of the same clay, twisted and shaped into related elements; part of a family, but each unique and considered carefully. The opening two songs are all frantic violence and tempo changes; Wait and Bleed features a melodic refrain and portends more traditional structure before dissolving back into the disjointed Surfacing. Purity's mostly straight rhythms and sung chorus give way to Prosthetics' slow fury and No Life's frenetic vacillations, which revolve around a pentatonic dirge that surfaces for a few bars and never returns. Scissors, the album's closer, takes every thematic edge we've heard and blends one into another, running us from its radio-play opening to sick, sludgy heights, nerve-wrenching droney screeching, and ending on a last gasp of vocal awfulness.

 

Each sonic element follows this idea as well. No idea is sacred - if an element is repeated, it's chopped up and rearranged, never getting too comfortable. Each instrument takes its turn rubberbanding syncopation off of a bed of building pressure. The excellent drumming somehow emphasizes offbeats while supporting every twist the songs take. The drums bind the ideas together - they balance and reinforce the grinding of the linked bass/guitars, allowing the vocal timing to swing comfortably offbeat. It's also the only metal album I know of to comfortably fuse tape elements into its songs - the Amen makes an appearance (Eyeless), and the scratching and sirens they use pay homage to drum and bass while actually adding to the material.

 

The vocals have more in common with hiphop and pop than metal vocals do, especially when Slipknot was released. What I mean is that assonance, texture, and rhythm preside over what you know he's going to talk about (pain, violence, insanity), with some notably unique touches ("You can't see California without Marlon Brando's eyes"). There's great versatility and showmanship texture-wise; Slipknot's vocals mimic their guitars, screaming high or deep; or they tremble as a preacher fearing God; or call out in cop-through-a-megaphone contempt - sometimes all in the same song. A few songs (Scissors) have more in common with abstract radio plays than metal, featuring mostly sonic detritus and muttered, harried spoken word consisting mostly of imagery and screaming.

 

My love for this album has led me to investigate their later work but so far nothing I've heard comes close to this tightrope walk of compositional excellence. The writing feels a lot like good Chopin or Aphex, where I hang on every note as the next word in a beautiful sentence, rewarding cursory listening and deeper exploration equally. My only major complaint is that the album is overcompressed, which is surprising as it was supposedly mastered "by hand" by the drummer and producer.

 

I think musicians could stand to learn a lot from this album. I certainly have.

 

Thank you and goodnight.

 

 

 

PS

 

 

this is me lol

slipknot.jpg

 

 

jk lol

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Ooh I hate Nardwar. His interview with Wesley Willis just pissed me right off.

 

I remember the 1st time i heard this album, I was in late high school, and in a metal band. The intro, then into the 1st song just made me :wtf: So brutal. They haven't topped that moment for me, and I don't expect them to, but yes, that 1st album is a metal classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Wall Bird

I'm partial to 'Iowa' myself. But yeah. Nice album. I'll have to listen to it again sometime soon and see how well it's aged.

 

I'm partial to 'Iowa' myself. But yeah. Nice album. I'll have to listen to it again sometime soon and see how well it's aged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never paid money to see this band but seen them live countless times over the years, due to being on a lot of festival line-ups and supporting Slayer. Though I don't really care much for them I reckon they do put on a good gig. Always more than happy to chill out and have a few beers and watch the spectacle unfold. It's sort of great entertainment and quite funny. I know scarier geezers who drink down my local boozer though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Sir Winston

They can make some awesome tunes, can't say I like everything on all the albums but some of it is absolutely stonking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh I was hugely into them in my earlier music days. Them, Korn and Limp Bizkit were among the first bands I ever electively listened to.

 

Slipknot has some serious rhythm going on in their insane rageful vocals, and they play around with alot of interesting melodic stuff in the background. I would say the entire Nu-Metal genre is to regular metal as IDM is to regular electronic music.

 

Korn and Limp Bizkit had better atmosphere going for the most part though.

 

Although... Scissors was a really good track, and they have done a few tracks that almost cross the line into IDM territory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh I was hugely into them in my earlier music days. Them, Korn and Limp Bizkit were among the first bands I ever electively listened to.

 

Slipknot has some serious rhythm going on in their insane rageful vocals, and they play around with alot of interesting melodic stuff in the background. I would say the entire Nu-Metal genre is to regular metal as IDM is to regular electronic music.

 

Korn and Limp Bizkit had better atmosphere going for the most part though.

 

Although... Scissors was a really good track, and they have done a few tracks that almost cross the line into IDM territory.

 

Imma argue the shit outta this post later, but I gotta run atm. DAMNIT THS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the entire Nu-Metal genre is to regular metal as IDM is to regular electronic music.

 

So IDM is aesthetically- and artistically bankrupt prepackaged teen angst for the mall-going masses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh I was hugely into them in my earlier music days. Them, Korn and Limp Bizkit were among the first bands I ever electively listened to.

 

Slipknot has some serious rhythm going on in their insane rageful vocals, and they play around with alot of interesting melodic stuff in the background. I would say the entire Nu-Metal genre is to regular metal as IDM is to regular electronic music.

 

Korn and Limp Bizkit had better atmosphere going for the most part though.

 

Although... Scissors was a really good track, and they have done a few tracks that almost cross the line into IDM territory.

 

Imma argue the shit outta this post later, but I gotta run atm. DAMNIT THS!

I assume you'll forget and this thread will forever remain a victory on my part :emotawesomepm9:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the entire Nu-Metal genre is to regular metal as IDM is to regular electronic music.

 

So IDM is aesthetically- and artistically bankrupt prepackaged teen angst for the mall-going masses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the entire Nu-Metal genre is to regular metal as IDM is to regular electronic music.

 

So IDM is aesthetically- and artistically bankrupt prepackaged teen angst for the mall-going masses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the entire Nu-Metal genre is to regular metal as IDM is to regular electronic music.

 

So IDM is aesthetically- and artistically bankrupt prepackaged teen angst for the mall-going masses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.