kaini Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 can we get the minecraft thread to 'HOT!'? yes we can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AcrossCanyons Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 fucking hell are some of you overreacting. it looks fine and the problems will be sorted out in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbpete Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Heh, you wanna see what changes Cook'd and Bomb'd made today on their site - http://www.cookdandbombd.co.uk/ (today is a comic sans veterans day special !) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ego Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 For the fixed-width layout. Can you put the "width: 960px !important;" on .main_width as well? The header is still full width. Edit: also, put max-width: 153px or so on .isUserPhoto to make the avatars behave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 in a few days you will forget what the old one looked like, and this will seem normal. happens every time. +1 - although, is this the default layout or the one you guys chose ?? spose i should read the rest of the thread, but i'm going fer a wolk. Are you guys afraid the server will overheat with all these hot threads? I know - I HATE that feature... fixed. ;) topics now require 99999 posts to become "HOT!" lol factor 9 ;-] hahah classic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J3FF3R00 Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Weird. I had an issue editing a post just now. I hit "edit" and the post just went blank. No edit page or window. *edit* I tried it again and now it works. Fishy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 i'm sure there's plenty i missed. feel free to add to my images Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosmachine Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 i'm working on a skin now, we'll see how it goes. it will probably just consist of me removing as much css as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zlemflolia Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 It no longer re-sizes posts to fit within whatever size I have Firefox at. Or maybe it didn't before but they were just naturally smaller. Either way it's inconvenient. I do not always want watmm to be my full screen. I never do, in fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 here's a forum design for Real Men Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 yeah, i can scroll the txt to any smaller size i want, but beyond a certain frame width the site won't play ball. Also hat, getting rid of last post would be stupid, i use that feature all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisRyder Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 sure is web 2.0 in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 I just went to insert a picture into a post and instead of instantly giving me the small handy dialogue box to insert the URL it had to load a frame right over the thread. gay. i used to be able ctrl+v the moment i pressed the picture button. IS WEB 2.0 Supposed to be this web 2pointslow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 My fault, actually - I'm behind on the Tapatalk updates. I'll take care of that shortly. yeah, this is crap. i can tolerate a new layout, but i can't tolerate crap. please put the old one back. or the one from three years ago! OR, you can just GTFO Good god, it would be so great if he left! you can stay, mr. enter a new display name, but i'd much appreciate it if you could stop posting under your dupe accounts "MAXIMUS MISCHIEF" and "sup" I just went to insert a picture into a post and instead of instantly giving me the small handy dialogue box to insert the URL it had to load a frame right over the thread. gay. i used to be able ctrl+v the moment i pressed the picture button. IS WEB 2.0 Supposed to be this web 2pointslow. yeah. i hit ctrl+l expecting to be teleported to my browser's URL bar. instead it loaded up some fucking frame because there are keybindings. ugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 yes, everybody take a step back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 i tried to right-click to save an image just now, and it loaded that image viewer frame with stupid animation only to give me the same exact image. i didn't want that stupid frame, i just wanted to right-click save-as. but apparently right click has now been hijacked by web 2.0 edit: try it. right click this bad boy below Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 works for me, i get the normal dialogue box. when i right-click and 'save image as'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Coalbucket PI Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 right click on images works for me Can anyone tell me how to turn avatars off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 well, in firefox 5.0/winxp, i don't get the normal right-click menu. i don't get any menu. what i get instead is an unnecessary image lightbox sorta fing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosmachine Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 no more off-topic posts, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaini Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 one minor gripe; from http://forum.watmm.com/, you can no longer jump to the most recent unread post on the top thread in a subforum like you used to be able to (i.e. this is the top post in gen bant; by clicking a little doohickey to the left of this in top-level view you used be able to jump to the most recent unread post, and that isn't there any more) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest disparaissant Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 one minor gripe; from the top-level"]http://forum.watmm.com/]top-level view of the forums[/url], you can no longer jump to the most recent unread post on the top post in a subforum like you used to be able to (i.e. this is the top post in gen bant; by clicking a little doohickey to the left of this in top-level view you used be able to jump to the most recent unread post, and that isn't there any more) i can ONLY go to the last unread post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lumpenprol Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Linked in just updated today with some faggotry as well, it's a conspiracy, et and troon to thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rixxx Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 I think it looks alright, I need the bigger text these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hahathhat Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 the board index does not shrink gracefully -- it turns into a real mess. here is a demonstration! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGF53_TD_Co Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.