amnesia Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 Hi all As you all know the Japanese CD is suppose to have 2 extra trax and a nicer design sleeve..... when anyone who bought it gets it can you plz confirm if it is worth grabbing TIA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rook Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 Hi all As you all know the Japanese CD is suppose to have 2 extra trax and a nicer design sleeve..... when anyone who bought it gets it can you plz confirm if it is worth grabbing TIA The first person who gets it will probably post the two extra tracks for all of us to enjoy and you can decide for yourself. It will probably just be excerpts from the Untilted Live set no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logboy Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 or $22 plus postage http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=BRC-333 no art yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishishiba Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 hmv say 2 bonus tracks, tower say its just 1, obviously hoping hmv is right. i contacted beat records who are licencing it in japan for confirmation, but am still waiting for a reply. i can upload 24 bit wav files when i get the album, no probs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CATS Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 i can upload 24 bit wav files when i get the album, no probs. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nene multiple assgasms Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 24 bits? cd quality is 16 bits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishishiba Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 24 bits? cd quality is 16 bits. yep, but i usually render all wav/aiffs at 24. either way, it'll be better than an mp3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CATS Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 24 bits? cd quality is 16 bits. yep, but i usually render all wav/aiffs at 24. either way, it'll be better than an mp3. hmmm/ whats do you gain by ripping at 24? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishishiba Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 maybe not so much in the case of a single audio file as in the case here. but usually when i make music i record and mix at 24 bits, simply because it'll improve the overall mix. plus, it doenst take up way much more disk space like recording at 32 bits. but usually if i send files to people i send at 24 bits/44100khz just to make it as high quality as possible. sometimes 48000khz if they request it. and i guessed that people here would prefer as decent quality Ae audio as possible... but yeah, if youre gonna burn it on a CD then 16 bits is perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcock Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 but if it comes at 16, ripping it at 24 doesnt mean its gonna get a magical 8 bits added to the music, its still 16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tidbit Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 he means super audio pro+ cd quality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joyrex Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 transcoding audio at a higher bitrate does not improve audio quality. Even moderately experienced people making Mp3s know this. You can't get more information out of a digital audio signal other than what's there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CATS Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 transcoding audio at a higher bitrate does not improve audio quality. Even moderately experienced people making Mp3s know this. You can't get more information out of a digital audio signal other than what's there. yea thats what i figured, but i just was curious if there was any real reason behind it (maybe personal ?_?)/ you should definately keep cdrips at 16 then/ but i think its sweet you release your own music in 48 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest all_purpose_sandpaper Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 24 is umcommon but sound. tomita's snoflakers for example: http://www.torrentreactor.net/view.php?id=829169 this label excreted a series of 24 masters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amnesia Posted February 1, 2008 Author Share Posted February 1, 2008 Anyone bought the Japan version yet?what is the extra track(s)??? oh shit i forget we all bought the bleeps I keep forgetting i dont have the physical CD yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishishiba Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 i was gonna buy the japanese edtiton, but i've ordered the bix set so i think i'll wait to see if the extra tracks include ths jap-jobbies before i buy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Synthacat 9 Posted February 1, 2008 Share Posted February 1, 2008 transcoding audio at a higher bitrate does not improve audio quality. Even moderately experienced people making Mp3s know this. You can't get more information out of a digital audio signal other than what's there. you can with waterboarding and other information extracting techniques! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ultravisitor Posted February 3, 2008 Share Posted February 3, 2008 just ordered it i'll enlighten you guys when i get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaen Posted February 3, 2008 Share Posted February 3, 2008 EVERYONE FUCKING SHUTUP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goiter Sanchez Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 *BUMP* This is the version I'll get if the tracks are exclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenneth172 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 maybe not so much in the case of a single audio file as in the case here. but usually when i make music i record and mix at 24 bits, simply because it'll improve the overall mix. plus, it doenst take up way much more disk space like recording at 32 bits. but usually if i send files to people i send at 24 bits/44100khz just to make it as high quality as possible. sometimes 48000khz if they request it. and i guessed that people here would prefer as decent quality Ae audio as possible... but yeah, if youre gonna burn it on a CD then 16 bits is perfect. 64bit would be preferable. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobDobalina Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 transcoding audio at a higher bitrate does not improve audio quality. Even moderately experienced people making Mp3s know this. You can't get more information out of a digital audio signal other than what's there. you can with waterboarding and other information extracting techniques! ¦0¦ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ultravisitor Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 arrived this morning. am sat having a spliff and listening to quaristice for the first proper time :omg: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Clitterhaus Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 People who feel the need to publicise their drug use lack moral fibre and are subconciously looking for justification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PusillanimousRex Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 People who feel the need to publicly berate drug users for a lack of moral fibre are subconciously looking for a convincing argument to spark one up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.