J3FF3R00 Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Crazy hats up in that shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spratters Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I've gotta listen to the bastard thing on the radio at work. I forgot how bloody long and boring all this wedding stuff is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keltoi Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 one would completely and utterly smash her back doors in. what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chassis Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 What a load of piss. Its on Irish TV too. 1.I dont give a shit about anyones wedding that Im not friends with. 2.I dont give a shit about the royal family (except for the TV show) That said, one would completely and utterly smash her back doors in. what? +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary C Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 one would completely and utterly smash her back doors in. what? N' stick mah mucky dick up 'er sister n'all. Urgh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jules Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 one would completely and utterly smash her back doors in. what? +1000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keltoi Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 nah her sister's not got the same posh-bird appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rumbo Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 You would think that the younger generation of Royals would be embarrassed to represent such an obscene waste of tax payer funds. Particularly given the current economic situation. Fuck 'em I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Npoess Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Ignore them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spratters Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I hear she promised to take it up the wrong'un on her honeymoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caretstik Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 an obscene waste of tax payer funds. Particularly given the current economic situation. Very well said, sir. Not even putting the telly on today, fuck all this moronic shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kokoon Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macca Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 You would think that the younger generation of Royals would be embarrassed to represent such an obscene waste of tax payer funds. Particularly given the current economic situation. Fuck 'em I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 gawd you miserable lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 The people who oppose the monarchy are very heavily underrepresented in the media - their voices are not heard at all. Everyone just assumes that all of the British public are onboard with them. They are an outdated, elitist group of people who create a division of wealth and "I'm better than you attitude" between them and the general public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Npoess Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 What Bread said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AcrossCanyons Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 The people who oppose the monarchy are very heavily underrepresented in the media - their voices are not heard at all. Everyone just assumes that all of the British public are onboard with them. They are an outdated, elitist group of people who create a division of wealth and "I'm better than you attitude" between them and the general public. They do have their good side tho. Think about all the money they put into the country through tourism etc. This wedding alone has foreigners from all over the world attending. Without the royal family we have nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caretstik Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Well we can always keep places like Buck House and the like, but we do we need the royal bastards themselves? How many tourists come here and actually even catch a glimpse of the fuckers themselves? It seems like the symbolism of royalty that attracts tourism, events like royal weddings happen (thankfully) once in a blue moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jim Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 The people who oppose the monarchy are very heavily underrepresented in the media - their voices are not heard at all. Everyone just assumes that all of the British public are onboard with them. They are an outdated, elitist group of people who create a division of wealth and "I'm better than you attitude" between them and the general public. They do have their good side tho. Think about all the money they put into the country through tourism etc. This wedding alone has foreigners from all over the world attending. Without the royal family we have nothing. According to Johann Hari, only one of the top 20 attractions in Britain is connected to the Royals and that's Windsor Castle at something like no. 17. Britain has plenty going for it and would be well rid of those disgusting spongers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goDel Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 lol wat? why do you think these people have no lives at all? being followed by the paparazzi 24/7. you shouldn't confuse the old concept of monarchy with the new one. in the new monarchy their function is nothing but a "cherry on top". don't go all " it's immoral" on something which is not much more than a play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCM Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 they're just two people getting married at the end of the day. I wish them good luck and happiness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adamovich Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 The people who oppose the monarchy are very heavily underrepresented in the media - their voices are not heard at all. Everyone just assumes that all of the British public are onboard with them. They are an outdated, elitist group of people who create a division of wealth and "I'm better than you attitude" between them and the general public. They do have their good side tho. Think about all the money they put into the country through tourism etc. This wedding alone has foreigners from all over the world attending. Without the royal family we have nothing. But what is more important - my statement, or tourism money? If we want progression, outdated structures should be questioned. I don't know about you but I want to live in a society where elitism is a thing of the past, and equality throughout is promoted in all areas. I doubt the implication of losing that tourism money is going to create huge problems for the UK government. There are other ways and means of creating revenue which the government has not even explored yet. I hear this "tourism money" argument endlessly all the time, it is such a weak argument to keep the monarchy going. they're just two people getting married at the end of the day. I wish them good luck and happiness. Look at what they are part of, what they represent. Not everyone has a huge wedding like this, costing millions of pounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plum Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 they're just two people getting married at the end of the day. I wish them good luck and happiness. double yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 lol wat? why do you think these people have no lives at all? being followed by the paparazzi 24/7. you shouldn't confuse the old concept of monarchy with the new one. in the new monarchy their function is nothing but a "cherry on top". don't go all " it's immoral" on something which is not much more than a play. Oh, poor them. They are born into absolute wealth, something which they have not necessarily "earned". Their contributions are charitable to an extent, but I'm sure if ANYONE were given the wealth they had, EVERYONE would be doing charitable work without a doubt. So you acknowledge that their role in society is minimal, and a mere "cherry on top" - why do we need them then? To keep a nonsensical, expensive "play" going, as you call it? Does not make any sense, and if people rationalise this through emotions, and "loving" the Royal Family, then the argument being proposed is even more weak because emotions are subjective as we all know. These emotions are not shared by everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.