Herr Jan Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 FLAC showing as 24bit... Is it still possible for him to just convert the 128kpbs to a 24 bit wav/flac? Not an expert, but I can't imagine that such a random person is in possession of this, Richard shared them with someone that he obviously trusts and if they would appear, they would appear via that noyze blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jasondonervan Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 There's a hefty FLAC download link on this 'unreleased Aphex' nonsense that FACT posted on April Fool's Day, same uploader: http://youtu.be/tyQufYJEssY Looking more and more like shifty shenanigans if you ask me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psn Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 WAV from youtube link: Soundcloud version: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris de Vries Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bitroast Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 There's a hefty FLAC download link on this 'unreleased Aphex' nonsense that FACT posted on April Fool's Day, same uploader: http://youtu.be/tyQufYJEssY Looking more and more like shifty shenanigans if you ask me i remember back a while back, friend was trying to upload something to what(or oink, or whatever) and it was downloaded from myspace and kept getting rejected for being low quality. so he added like 1% of reverb and exported it to wav. and it was now rendered as high quality. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeptinoid Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 There's a hefty FLAC download link on this 'unreleased Aphex' nonsense that FACT posted on April Fool's Day, same uploader: http://youtu.be/tyQufYJEssY Looking more and more like shifty shenanigans if you ask me i remember back a while back, friend was trying to upload something to what(or oink, or whatever) and it was downloaded from myspace and kept getting rejected for being low quality. so he added like 1% of reverb and exported it to wav. and it was now rendered as high quality. :) I want the blue one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petina Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 yeeeaaahhhh...... (i am wondering where he got the 1192x1192 analord 10 cover from though, looks like it's almost the original resolution) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bitroast Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 yeeeaaahhhh...... (i am wondering where he got the 1192x1192 analord 10 cover from though, looks like it's almost the original resolution) rephlex website had em along with Analord 1-11. I can up them later tonight / tomorrow if no one else does : ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petina Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 yeeeaaahhhh...... (i am wondering where he got the 1192x1192 analord 10 cover from though, looks like it's almost the original resolution) rephlex website had em along with Analord 1-11. I can up them later tonight / tomorrow if no one else does : ) ooh, yes please!!! i would love you forever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delet... Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Wow, that's a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petina Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 high resolution art is important to me, you see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphex_Squarepusher_Twin Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 If that guy just converted the soundcloud low quality version into a wav or flac, then megalol. If not, how did this random person obtain it? P.S. - don't forget that unreleased tracks like these also have copyright, so the same rules apply for sharing unreleased tracks on here. lol - that's possible, it does to be strong to do that, but i know it's possible... Don't care the copyright if some titles are never offered for sale... FLAC showing as 24bit... lol - that's not possible... otherwise can u share it with me by PM? high resolution art is important to me, you see same thing for me! ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalybs Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Guys, i'm Ignisarchives i just record these tracks and turn them into various formats cuz i don't know shit. I'm serious. Can't say i hear a difference from the soundcloud version though. Can any of you explain what you're analyzing here so i know if it necessary at all to convert them to all these formats for my viewers or if i should just make MP3's from now on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascdi Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 lol wut rly? but a hearty YEAH to analord art from me as well! Upload that ish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bitroast Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord01.jpg http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord02.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord03.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord04.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord05.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord06.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord07.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord08.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord09.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord10.png http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q76/Piggs01/Analord11.png http://s133.photobucket.com/user/Piggs01/media/ConfederationTrough.png.html http://s133.photobucket.com/user/Piggs01/media/RushupEdge.png.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petina Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 cheers, dude! i've been after these for ages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pissflaps Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 There's no ways these flacs could have been legit, it doesn't make sense that a random person would be in posession of w.i.p flacs. When is noyzelab going to drop the interview? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saikobjorn Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Guys, i'm Ignisarchives i just record these tracks and turn them into various formats cuz i don't know shit. I'm serious. Can't say i hear a difference from the soundcloud version though. Can any of you explain what you're analyzing here so i know if it necessary at all to convert them to all these formats for my viewers or if i should just make MP3's from now on? In my opinion, flac/wav is the way to go, because if you make mp3's out of an already lossy file then the lossy conversion will be done twice. But when you do share such files, the best thing is to put something like (soundcloud rip) or (lossy source) in the filename, so people don't go about sharing the files thinking they are legit lossless files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Human Bean Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 If you're grabbing the audio file from soundcloud it's a 128 kbps mp3 and converting it to flac or wav is worse than pointless. All it will do is increase the file size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petina Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Guys, i'm Ignisarchives i just record these tracks and turn them into various formats cuz i don't know shit. I'm serious. Can't say i hear a difference from the soundcloud version though. Can any of you explain what you're analyzing here so i know if it necessary at all to convert them to all these formats for my viewers or if i should just make MP3's from now on? In my opinion, flac/wav is the way to go, because if you make mp3's out of an already lossy file then the lossy conversion will be done twice. But when you do share such files, the best thing is to put something like (soundcloud rip) or (lossy source) in the filename, so people don't go about sharing the files thinking they are legit lossless files. no... when you save the file from soundcloud you are saving a direct copy of the mp3 as it is on soundcloud. there is no secondary compression. re-saving it as flac/wav is pointless and will just bloat the file Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saikobjorn Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 Okay then! I didn't know you could get the mp3 file directly from soundcloud. Sorry about the misleading comment- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.