cear Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57428067-83/fbi-we-need-wiretap-ready-web-sites-now/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pennywise Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 hi steve do u wanna make a bomb tonight. steve likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr lopez Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 hi steve do u wanna make a bomb tonight. steve likes this lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanakori Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 It's time to divise those services by countries and make them all work with the same protocol but with the servers distributed through the different areas. Like Facebook.eu//ch etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanakori Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 I just need the cash man.... Let's do this. Wearethesocials.com Joyrex lend me some millions pls pls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoodie Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 i don't think the internet as we know it will be around in a decade--either as a result of government intervention or isps modifying how we access content i.e. a tiered system. here's hoping i'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o00o Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 whats the difference to this: http://minus.com/mbk9GcJL8A/1g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chassis Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 It's time to divise those services by countries and make them all work with the same protocol but with the servers distributed through the different areas. Like Facebook.eu//ch etc. Im pretty sure its already like that. The contract between facebook and the user has the laws of the country of the user. Pretty sure the EU over ruled all of that cookie monitoring shit they were gonna do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanakori Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 It's time to divise those services by countries and make them all work with the same protocol but with the servers distributed through the different areas. Like Facebook.eu//ch etc. Im pretty sure its already like that. The contract between facebook and the user has the laws of the country of the user. Pretty sure the EU over ruled all of that cookie monitoring shit they were gonna do. I'm not sure it is that clear, anyway the HQ should be based on some really isolated Island off shore. whats the difference to this: http://minus.com/mbk9GcJL8A/1g Not surprised, but it's still disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanakori Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 It's the whole humanity in the hand of a corrupted nation. This information is some of the most valuable thing around and it has been cosnpurcated by private interests and paranoia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenGOD Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 whats the difference to this: http://minus.com/mbk9GcJL8A/1g That one requires a warrant/court order. This may surprise you but judges do not just hand them out willy-nilly. The FBI request is about not needing warrants or anything. It's J. Edgar Hoover's wettest of wet dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pennywise Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 just a question that I'm interested in hearing the answer to... if they caught just one terrorist , would it be justified? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ruiagnelo Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 hide yo kids, hide yo wife Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenGOD Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 just a question that I'm interested in hearing the answer to... if they caught just one terrorist , would it be justified? no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pennywise Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 just a question that I'm interested in hearing the answer to... if they caught just one terrorist , would it be justified? no. shit answer explain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanakori Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 Use your head and weight the 2 options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaen Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 people will simply stop using these services and switch to others if this happens. it would be suicide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pennywise Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 Use your head and weight the 2 options. you mean peoples lives and things that you choose to put on the internet. ie I enjoyed a burger today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanakori Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 Use your head and weight the 2 options. you mean peoples lives and things that you choose to put on the internet. ie I enjoyed a burger today No, it's called privacy and freedom of speech. And it's also a fundamental right protected by the Human rights bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pennywise Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 Use your head and weight the 2 options. you mean peoples lives and things that you choose to put on the internet. ie I enjoyed a burger today No, it's called privacy and freedom of speech. so you're are happy to let terrorists exploit that and set up attacks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcock Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 Use your head and weight the 2 options. you mean peoples lives and things that you choose to put on the internet. ie I enjoyed a burger today No, it's called privacy and freedom of speech. so you're are happy to let terrorists exploit that and set up attacks? yeah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chassis Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 On facebook? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chenGOD Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 just a question that I'm interested in hearing the answer to... if they caught just one terrorist , would it be justified? no. shit answer explain Do I really have to explain to you why allowing the FBI to monitor private conversations (this would include e-mail, private messaging, skype chats etc. not just status updates and what you post on the wall) is not in anyway justifiable without some sort of court order? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanakori Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 If it was only that. Those terrorists are not the worst ennemy here. Also, yes I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joseph Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 people will simply stop using these services and switch to others if this happens. it would be suicide I wish I could believe this but I'm really not so sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.