Jump to content
IGNORED

Iran vs US/Israel conflict escalating


Hautlle

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 255
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Obama requests drone return

 

Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney on Monday criticized Obama's decisions on the drone, but for an entirely different reason. He said that, after the aircraft went down, the president should have ordered an airstrike over Iran.

"The right response to that would have been to go in immediately after it had gone down and destroy it," the Republican, who served with President George W. Bush, told CNN's Erin Burnett. "You can do that from the air ... and, in effect, make it impossible for them to benefit from having captured that drone."

Instead, "he asked nicely for them to return it, and they aren't going to," Cheney said.

 

Well, could be worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama requests drone return

 

Former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney on Monday criticized Obama's decisions on the drone, but for an entirely different reason. He said that, after the aircraft went down, the president should have ordered an airstrike over Iran.

"The right response to that would have been to go in immediately after it had gone down and destroy it," the Republican, who served with President George W. Bush, told CNN's Erin Burnett. "You can do that from the air ... and, in effect, make it impossible for them to benefit from having captured that drone."

Instead, "he asked nicely for them to return it, and they aren't going to," Cheney said.

 

Well, could be worse.

 

Holy shit his programming is really out of whack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Syria is the next place they be invadin'. By proxy already.

you and your "they" again..there's no unified "they" in our world, why can't you get it already ?

i think baby assad would love to start some shit with israel to direct the nation against the old enemy, not the other way around. it's already something resembling a civil/ethnically based war in there. his regime will crumble soon without anyone's involvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Syria is the next place they be invadin'. By proxy already.

you and your "they" again..there's no unified "they" in our world, why can't you get it already ?

i think baby assad would love to start some shit with israel to direct the nation against the old enemy, not the other way around. it's already something resembling a civil/ethnically based war in there. his regime will crumble soon without anyone's involvement.

 

t feels as though media here in the west tends to focus on civil unrest that we then become directly/indirectly involved in, while other conflicts that run parallel are hardly reported on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Holy shit his programming is really out of whack.

 

Yeah, I personally don't really care for Obama, but at least he isn't a fool cowboy like those in the previous administration.

 

this is true, he just has spent the last 3 years bending over backwards so that his group of fool cowboy friends keep their trampling on the constitution permanent while making sure the law never touches them for the war crimes they committed

 

Syria is the next place they be invadin'. By proxy already.

you and your "they" again..there's no unified "they" in our world, why can't you get it already ?

 

i think he just meant America dude, chill out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't believe in the binary of the lesser of two evils, i just find it fascinating that a republican in the race is significantly more liberal on key issues than the first black president of the united states who used to hang out with a communist guy who bombed a police station in the early 70s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well that's were you and i differ, for me civil liberties and our foreign policy our the most important issues at the moment. Obama and every single other republican candidate running right now fails equally and miserably on both counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see any independents being able to challenge the GOP/Dems, who have both moved farther to the right the past decade and slowly but surely chipped away civil rights and liberties and let corporations expand their influence. And if anyone steps up and looks to challenge the status quo, they can always detain them indefinitely as a "terrorist".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think Ron Paul is significantly more to the left of Obama on civil liberties, please read the actual articles the GG links to. Where Paul discusses his opposition to the Civil Liberties Act, how he thinks that stores should be able to discriminate at will, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

threatening.jpg

 

The stars are US controlled military bases.

http://www.nytimes.c...indicators.html

 

you can forget about bases in Afghanistan - troops there barely control the bases, they're scared to go outside them. Even Kabul is seeing increasing attacks.

 

To continue what Chen pointed out, the vast majority of those are not permanent bases, but airports and air bases the US is allowed to operate from, sometimes just for logistics and refueling, not actual combat operations. Also, the US left Prince Sultan in 2003 per Saudi requests. Ganci and Manas are the same facility. Incirlik is the closest thing to a permanent USAF base on this map.

 

That said, we're still very much deployed in the area beyond Afghanistan - particularly in Qatar and Bahrain, but I had to clarify that most of those stars aren't "US controlled bases."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think Ron Paul is significantly more to the left of Obama on civil liberties, please read the actual articles the GG links to. Where Paul discusses his opposition to the Civil Liberties Act, how he thinks that stores should be able to discriminate at will, etc...

 

you mean the civil rights act? he believes that if you own private property you should be allowed to do whatever you want with it including being a racist asshole. I don't agree with him on this count, it's allowing slightly more freedom of the individual than i am comfortable with. to me him opposing this does not diminish and individual's freedom, but i do think the civil rights act has an overall benefit for society clearly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i just finished reading an article in foreign affairs written by an obvious hawk/ex pentagon general.

the crux of the biscuit from his vantage is that it would be better to attack now before they have the bomb rather than wait until they do and he feels this is inevitable-that they will have a working missile mounted nuke within 1-2 years.

furthermore it seems the majority of the Iranian populace are sick of the mullah's antiquated religious totalitarian bullshit and a regime change is also inevitable-either from within or from a US/Israeli invasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling is that the Iranians would rather keep the leadership they have than let some outside monitor come in and take over, essentially ruining their culture. I think that played a large role into why he was reelected and why most iranians were ok with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling is that the Iranians would rather keep the leadership they have than let some outside monitor come in and take over, essentially ruining their culture. I think that played a large role into why he was reelected and why most iranians were ok with that.

 

Oh you and your "cultural sensitivity" Don't you realize these people are savages?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.