Jump to content

T ess xi harmony


Recommended Posts

T ess xi starts off with a chord progression, 16 bars long, shown in the attached image.

 

post-14347-0-22160300-1552755942_thumb.jpg

 

In bar 1 we have four notes (music harmony people: Eb major seventh chord). For our purpose here, think of those four notes as two intervals played simultaneously, the lower interval (coloured dark grey), and the upper (light grey) interval.

 

From this initial position in bar 1, the movement of those intervals for bars [1..8] is as follows:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Going from bar 8 to bar 9, the intervals change: their low notes are shifted up two rows (so whereas the intervals were perfect fifths in bars [1..8], they've now become perfect fourths for bars [9..16]). Following that, for bars [9..16] the "intervallic movement" stays the same as in bars [1..8], so again:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row [!]
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Notice what happens in bar 15 (indicated with [!]): as the lower interval is moved down 1 row, two notes now overlap (in F#) and are fused together.

 

This progression is heard twice (so bars [17..32] are identical to [1..16]).  After that, the entire process is repeated but lowered by a semitone etc.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

T ess xi starts off with a chord progression, 16 bars long, shown in the attached image.

 

attachicon.gifAe - t ess xi harmony.jpg

 

In bar 1 we have four notes (music harmony people: Eb major seventh chord). For our purpose here, think of those four notes as two intervals played simultaneously, the lower interval (coloured dark grey), and the upper (light grey) interval.

 

From this initial position in bar 1, the movement of those intervals for bars [1..8] is as follows:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Going from bar 8 to bar 9, the intervals change: their low notes are shifted up two rows (so whereas the intervals were perfect fifths in bars [1..8], they've now become perfect fourths for bars [9..16]). Following that, for bars [9..16] the "intervallic movement" stays the same as in bars [1..8], so again:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row [!]
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Notice what happens in bar 15 (indicated with [!]): as the lower interval is moved down 1 row, two notes now overlap (in F#) and are fused together.

 

This progression is heard twice (so bars [17..32] are identical to [1..16]).  After that, the entire process is repeated but lowered by a semitone etc.

 

hey! thnx man!

 

does this have a name? is it a known technique in the theory?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this! I had a little trouble understanding your diagram, but it seems like with the chord voicing, that the notes from one chord to the next move up or down either in semi-tones or whole steps. This seems to abide by the rules of classical harmony. I tried learning more about harmony once by reading Schoenberg's Theory of Harmony. Understood very little of it and did not do any of the exercises, but (if I understood your diagram) this seems to be textbook classical harmony - taking the shortest possible route (voicing-wise) when moving from one chord to the next. Schoenberg also mentions the idea of building chords with fourths and fifths (instead of thirds) as a means of building up to his more radical innovations, which seems to link up with your analysis. I could never get into his music (in spite of several honest attempts) and I also never heard Autechre reference him or any other classical musician pre-Stockhausen, but there are some interesting ideas there. The idea that harmony evolved based on humans discovering the natural harmonic series on their own and gradually making dissonances conventional (adding them into the harmonic vocabulary) is also interesting. Apparently in ancient Greece, there was a time when the only harmony was everyone singing in unison - Dionysian yes, but not all that interesting and definitely not up to par with the splendors of a piece like 'Vose In'.

Edited by Guest
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

T ess xi starts off with a chord progression, 16 bars long, shown in the attached image.

 

attachicon.gifAe - t ess xi harmony.jpg

 

In bar 1 we have four notes (music harmony people: Eb major seventh chord). For our purpose here, think of those four notes as two intervals played simultaneously, the lower interval (coloured dark grey), and the upper (light grey) interval.

 

From this initial position in bar 1, the movement of those intervals for bars [1..8] is as follows:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Going from bar 8 to bar 9, the intervals change: their low notes are shifted up two rows (so whereas the intervals were perfect fifths in bars [1..8], they've now become perfect fourths for bars [9..16]). Following that, for bars [9..16] the "intervallic movement" stays the same as in bars [1..8], so again:

  • move the upper interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row
  • move the lower interval down 1 row [!]
  • move the upper interval down 1 row

Notice what happens in bar 15 (indicated with [!]): as the lower interval is moved down 1 row, two notes now overlap (in F#) and are fused together.

 

This progression is heard twice (so bars [17..32] are identical to [1..16]).  After that, the entire process is repeated but lowered by a semitone etc.

 

hey! thnx man!

 

does this have a name? is it a known technique in the theory?

 

yeah. paralell fifths. And it's forbidden. :D ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice analysis. Maybe I'm slightly ignorant but this is just rave though right?

 

(Not posting to be aggressive/inflammatory. I just hear/see it as a rave thing)

Edited by donquixote
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Joyrex
      http://media.warp.net/images/20110421-japanbig%5B1%5D.jpg
       
      ATP announce Made In Japan benefit concert, with Squarepusher, LFO and Fuck Buttons, plus a new, exclusive Autechre track as part of the ticket price.
       
      The concert will take place at the Forum in London and all of the profits will go to the Japanese Red Cross Charity in support of people affected by the disaster. We hope you can support our friends at ATP with the event.
       
      Afterwards, head to Warp at Bang the Box, part of Lovebox festival's Pop-Up series at Village Underground, with Hudson Mo, Rustie, Kwes and special guest Benji B going late.
       
       
      THURSDAY 21st APRIL
      BANK HOLIDAY WEEKEND
       
      ATP Concerts presents... Made In Japan
      @ The Forum, London. 6pm-12am
       
      Squarepusher (improv/jam set)
      LFO
      Fuck Buttons
       
      Guest DJs:
      N>E>D
      Declan Allen
       
      Buy tickets and receive a free new Autechre track '6852'
       
      **
       
      Lovebox presents...Warp at Bang The Box
      @ Village Underground, London. 10pm-5am
       
      Hudson Mohawke
      Rustie
      Kwes
      special guest Benji B
       
      HMV Tickets / Ticketweb
    • By Joyrex
      We've been blessed with not one but TWO great AE releases in a short span of time, with 20 great tracks to consume, analyze, and absorb - but overall, which one is the better of the two?
    • By Zantman
      Mix of the two different 'Domino' recordings from their performance on 9 April, 2010 in Brussels.
    • By Zantman
      View File AE_LIVE_TORONTO_MIX_090501
      Soundboard mixed (except p2) with the bootleg recording
      Submitter Zantman Submitted 10/10/20 Category Autechre  
    • By Zantman
      Soundboard mixed (except p2) with the bootleg recording
×
×
  • Create New...