psn Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ambermonk Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Can we just throw Orange Scrotum and Fat Boy into the ring and let them have at it while we munch on popcorn? It would be a hell of a lot better way for them to settle their differences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubin Farr Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auxien Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 lol the FBI raided Manafort's house. This shit is moving quicker than expected, I think that's maybe bad for Trump? Maybe it's really good though, I dunno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olo Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 Trump is really trying to make that old Simpsons spoof on him come true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ambermonk Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 lol the FBI raided Manafort's house. This shit is moving quicker than expected, I think that's maybe bad for Trump? Maybe it's really good though, I dunno. I thought Trump just appointed a new FBI director? So much for loyalty lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubin Farr Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 lol the FBI raided Manafort's house. This shit is moving quicker than expected, I think that's maybe bad for Trump? Maybe it's really good though, I dunno.I thought Trump just appointed a new FBI director? So much for loyalty lol That raid was weeks ago but just made public, so Mueller probly got the warrant approved before the new FBI pawn hit the ground. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fbi-conducted-predawn-raid-of-former-trump-campaign-chairman-manaforts-home/2017/08/09/5879fa9c-7c45-11e7-9d08-b79f191668ed_story.html?utm_term=.38144fff6749 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psn Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 https://twitter.com/SteveKopack/status/895358655905792001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zero Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 (edited) I wonder what it will take for Twitter to finally shut down his account. I mean initiating WWIII must surely violate one of its guidelines? Edited August 10, 2017 by zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 i bet his password is easy to guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psn Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubin Farr Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 He shouldn't have crossed Paulie Walnuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubin Farr Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 So do we think Drumpf is actually stupid enough to nuke a foreign country, or just use conventional warfare to cripple their nuclear capability? I can't imagine the Joint Chiefs would sign off on launching an actual warhead, knowing the fallout that would rain down on S Korea, China and Japan. This seems more like a Gulf War I scenario, with the added bonus of evacuating the entire Southern Korea peninsula. So then where do those people go, Japan? Philippines? Guam? Not likely. But then again, this is a very stupid man who thinks he is intelligent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psn Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Dunning and Kruger like the world has never seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshuatxuk Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 (edited) It would be really, really unprecedented if we did an airstrike and/or any other assault. Keep this in perspective, every invasion we've done since WWII was against non-nuclear states: Korea pre-USSR nukes, Vietnam, Panama, Gulf War I & Iraq War, Grenada, Bosnia, Somalia, etc. not to mention the strikes on Libya, Sudan, etc. were all non-nuclear armed states. Iraq had chemical agents and a program but it was dealt with by Iran and Israel. As much as the US and USSR battled via proxy states and proxy wars, detente kept direct attacks completely off the table. That's why incidents like the Cuban Missile crisis (not to mention a slew of then classified or the overlooked other incidents) so damn scary The US had planes and helos shot down by the DPRK. The ROK has lost men and ships to DPRK skirmishes and attacks. The DPRK has lost troops to skirmishes. The DRPK has committed terrorist attacks. Tensions were high but not once has the US responded with military action and strikes. Every POTUS since Truman has had to deal with the DPRK and every single one did so firmly but responsibly. North Korea is fucking with us because we have a hothead in power. They want the attention, they want to be taken seriously, they want to assert power in the region. Trump is feeding these motives. Edited August 10, 2017 by joshuatx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignatius Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeAreOceans Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 So do we think Drumpf is actually stupid enough to nuke a foreign country, or just use conventional warfare to cripple their nuclear capability? I can't imagine the Joint Chiefs would sign off on launching an actual warhead, knowing the fallout that would rain down on S Korea, China and Japan. This seems more like a Gulf War I scenario, with the added bonus of evacuating the entire Southern Korea peninsula. So then where do those people go, Japan? Philippines? Guam? Not likely. But then again, this is a very stupid man who thinks he is intelligent. what's the process for declaring war or, well, nuking a country for US govt? I'm assuming it's not just Trump's decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubin Farr Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 It would be really, really unprecedented if we did an airstrike and/or any other assault. Keep this in perspective, every invasion we've done since WWII was against non-nuclear states: Korea pre-USSR nukes, Vietnam, Panama, Gulf War I & Iraq War, Grenada, Bosnia, Somalia, etc. not to mention the strikes on Libya, Sudan, etc. were all non-nuclear armed states. Iraq had chemical agents and a program but it was dealt with by Iran and Israel. As much as the US and USSR battled via proxy states and proxy wars, detente kept direct attacks completely off the table. That's why incidents like the Cuban Missile crisis (not to mention a slew of then classified or the overlooked other incidents) so damn scary The US had planes and helos shot down by the DPRK. The ROK has lost men and ships to DPRK skirmishes and attacks. The DPRK has lost troops to skirmishes. The DRPK has committed terrorist attacks. Tensions were high but not once has the US responded with military action and strikes. Every POTUS since Truman has had to deal with the DPRK and every single one did so firmly but responsibly. North Korea is fucking with us because we have a hothead in power. They want the attention, they want to be taken seriously, they want to assert power in the region. Trump is feeding these motives. Remember, our navy has a vast strike force capability, before Gulf War I, no one had seen a Tomahawk missle fire off, then they did like a thousand at once, so who knows what capability the US has now, possibly crippling cyber attacks, even more advanced cruise missiles, attack drones, maybe some kind of satellite weapon? Those drone space shuttles weren't launched for nothng. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candiru Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 I read this comment somewhere and loled: "Mitch McConnell is like a Navy SEAL of not getting shit done." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whosebrian Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 Caught in the cross hairs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ambermonk Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 Already changed me av accordingly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubin Farr Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 There really is no difference "fire and fury, whatever the fuck threat" compensating for small dicks. Hitler had a micro penis as well, did we learn nothing from WWII? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshuatxuk Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 menwholooklikeoldlesbians.blogspot.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshuatxuk Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 It would be really, really unprecedented if we did an airstrike and/or any other assault. Keep this in perspective, every invasion we've done since WWII was against non-nuclear states: Korea pre-USSR nukes, Vietnam, Panama, Gulf War I & Iraq War, Grenada, Bosnia, Somalia, etc. not to mention the strikes on Libya, Sudan, etc. were all non-nuclear armed states. Iraq had chemical agents and a program but it was dealt with by Iran and Israel. As much as the US and USSR battled via proxy states and proxy wars, detente kept direct attacks completely off the table. That's why incidents like the Cuban Missile crisis (not to mention a slew of then classified or the overlooked other incidents) so damn scary The US had planes and helos shot down by the DPRK. The ROK has lost men and ships to DPRK skirmishes and attacks. The DPRK has lost troops to skirmishes. The DRPK has committed terrorist attacks. Tensions were high but not once has the US responded with military action and strikes. Every POTUS since Truman has had to deal with the DPRK and every single one did so firmly but responsibly. North Korea is fucking with us because we have a hothead in power. They want the attention, they want to be taken seriously, they want to assert power in the region. Trump is feeding these motives. Remember, our navy has a vast strike force capability, before Gulf War I, no one had seen a Tomahawk missle fire off, then they did like a thousand at once, so who knows what capability the US has now, possibly crippling cyber attacks, even more advanced cruise missiles, attack drones, maybe some kind of satellite weapon? Those drone space shuttles weren't launched for nothng. Good points, especially regarding the cyber attacks and space stuff. I keep forgetting those are options / "other fronts" along with traditional airstrikes and cruise missiles. The key thing always is that any consequences will fall on the ROK, China, Japan, etc., whether it's a counterattack, mass exodus of civilian refugees into China, The only Americans truly at risk right now are military personal stationed in the region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 There really is no difference "fire and fury, whatever the fuck threat" compensating for small dicks. Hitler had a micro penis as well, did we learn nothing from WWII? Apparently I just learned Hitler had a small penis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts