Jump to content
IGNORED

13 years of Windowlicker!


Revitute

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Rumor has that it refers to retarded kids licking the windows of school buses. I think there is one more, but I can't remember it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest isaki

"Windowlicker" rules.

 

 

BTW does anyone know what the word 'windowlicker' refers to? Is it a common term somewhere or other or is it just a rando RDJ word?

in the UK, or atleast in Scotland, there were "blue buses" -- council operated buses that would take retarded fellows... somewhere.

as a teen when one of these buses passed by your friends would say "missed your bus!"

 

anyway yeah, a windowlicker is a retard -- it refers to their actions on said buses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"Windowlicker" rules.

 

 

BTW does anyone know what the word 'windowlicker' refers to? Is it a common term somewhere or other or is it just a rando RDJ word?

in the UK, or atleast in Scotland, there were "blue buses" -- council operated buses that would take retarded fellows... somewhere.

as a teen when one of these buses passed by your friends would say "missed your bus!"

 

anyway yeah, a windowlicker is a retard -- it refers to their actions on said buses

 

I thought "windowlicker" referred to someone that licks windows. also, quite a nice track. excellent i would say. 5/5; 10/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest isaki

 

 

"Windowlicker" rules.

 

 

BTW does anyone know what the word 'windowlicker' refers to? Is it a common term somewhere or other or is it just a rando RDJ word?

in the UK, or atleast in Scotland, there were "blue buses" -- council operated buses that would take retarded fellows... somewhere.

as a teen when one of these buses passed by your friends would say "missed your bus!"

 

anyway yeah, a windowlicker is a retard -- it refers to their actions on said buses

 

I thought "windowlicker" referred to someone that licks windows.

well they do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have fond memories of the days when Global Goon would troll the rec.music.ambient forums on usenet under various sock puppets and claim that Aphex's new material, namely window licker, was a ripoff of him. I wonder if they are still up online, would be fun to dig up for historical purposes

 

totally unrelated but i think Windowlicker was the first track i ever heard with intentional mp3-like dithering effects. When the mp3 leaked online people were complained how shitty the quality was and were disappointed when they heard the real thing and realized it was on purpose/in the final track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aphex mp3s were leaking in 99? in those days it took an hour to dl one song, and the vast majority of people didn't even know about mp3s yet...

 

the track does have kind of a junky sound to it tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intentional mp3 dithering effects? Nah. Mp3 compression was still very much in development back then. There were all kinds of shady compression methods back then and the standard 128kbps didnt help either. O, and napster was made the same year windowlicker got released so the whole piracy downloads crap was still to come. I don't think mp3 dithering effects were on his mind back then. Would it really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aphex mp3s were leaking in 99? in those days it took an hour to dl one song, and the vast majority of people didn't even know about mp3s yet...

 

the track does have kind of a junky sound to it tho

 

yes, if you think about it IDM geeks have always been at the tip of the spear in terms of file sharing, i mean hell Soulseek records started as practically an IDM label. I think back then people would mostly share private FTPs, and i had a cable modem in 1997 so i don't really agree about the taking an hour to download part, at least not for me :emotawesomepm9:

 

I don't think mp3 dithering effects were on his mind back then. Would it really?

 

absolutely, go listen to the song again. And i'm not saying he ran it through a shit lossy encoder on purpose. He probably used some kind of Soundhack or Kyma spectral dithering effect. I'm remembering distinctly the opening jazzy organ chops that start the song, at least the intro is dithered and sounds so on the CD as well. (too lazy to pull up song)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

aphex mp3s were leaking in 99? in those days it took an hour to dl one song, and the vast majority of people didn't even know about mp3s yet...

 

the track does have kind of a junky sound to it tho

 

yes, if you think about it IDM geeks have always been at the tip of the spear in terms of file sharing, i mean hell Soulseek records started as practically an IDM label. I think back then people would mostly share private FTPs, and i had a cable modem in 1997 so i don't really agree about the taking an hour to download part, at least not for me :emotawesomepm9:

 

> I don't think mp3 dithering effects were on his mind back then. Would it really?

 

absolutely, go listen to the song again. And i'm not saying he ran it through a shit lossy encoder on purpose. He probably used some kind of Soundhack or Kyma spectral dithering effect. I'm remembering distinctly the opening jazzy organ chops that start the song, at least the intro is dithered and sounds so on the CD as well. (too lazy to pull up song)

 

i think i know what you are talking about, to me it's a 'thin' sound. dithering is one thing that i don't know a whole lot about except some about when and where to use it, but i'm not so sure if the lo-fi effect in question is actually dithering. maybe it is, like i said i'm not super knowledgeable on dithering itself but i'm really doubting it. i didn't think dithering had anything to do with how mp3s work. i always just kind of assumed that that effect had something to do with the compression method used to trim down the data. i think i've actually noticed it in windowlicker before and did actually think it sounded like low quality (128kbps) mp3 sound. but i still dont think it has anything to do with dithering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when i say 'dithering' i'm not using the term in the audio production literal sense. I'm not talking about downsampling a wave file from 24-bit to 16-bit or anything like that, i just mean it as a general catch all term as a method of degrading the quality of a sound. bit-crushing, fake vinyl recording filter are all different types of dithering sound to me. I think RDJ just probably was using spectral processing tools before most people, and just like a lot of the production techniques he did they were used at a time when no one else was doing them. As far as im concerned Funny Little Man is the first song i ever heard with an 'auto-tune' effect, but i dont think it was antares auto-tune, i'm guessing probably the pitch stepper in an eventide effects processor. this plugin 'Spectral COnvoluter" came with a plugin pack called Anarchy FX, it didn't exist back when Windowlicker came out but if you've played with it, you'll immediately hear the same style processing that happens on Windowlicker. What it does is takes in a sound and separates it into tones or noise using an FFT analyzer, when you turn the Depth all the way to the 'tone' side it sounds pretty much exactly like a really shitty low bit rate mp3, or even a messed up encoding.

convoluter.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i kind of assumed that that's what you meant.

anyway i think you are right that there probably was some intentional effect in there to give a downgraded lo-fi digital sound, and i now kind of wonder if maybe he did actually encode some of his samples to low bitrate mp3 or realaudio or something similar. i've thought about doing that before but i've always decided against it because it just doesn't seem like a pleasing sound. i love bitcrusher/sample rate reducer type effects, but a low quality mp3/realaudio sound is just shit. weird that he'd intentionally try to achieve that effect, but i think you're right and he did.

 

edit- holy shit yeah you're right it's that exact sound! i love that anarchy fx stuff and yes, when you turn the depth control down below around 20% you get that 'watery' sound. it's also the same sound you get when you abuse noise reduction software so maybe that's what he did. there were plenty of noise reduction programs around..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

re: noise reduction, yes there were, when i first heard it my only knowledge of how to do that was Cooledit pro's noise reduction feature.
Soundforge had a similar sounding one at the time too. Since i know he was a Mac user at the time, he probably used Metasynth or Soundhack to do it. Metasynth can load in samples into a visual spectrogram and then let you blur or pixelate them. It's possible he fucked with encoding passes of layers for the song at an intentionally low bit rate too, the result would be similar but would probably take more time and toying around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though I love this track and appreciate it's brilliance I very, rarely play it. I wouldn't even put it in my top 25 tracks of his tbh, though it's one of his most genuis. Don't know why. Perhaps because its been done to death.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

convoluter.jpg

Woah, I remember that - If I remember correctly I got a horrible trojan whilst downloading a crack/keygen for it. It's interesting to see that the whole thing is available for free on their site now !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that "Windowlicker" is the translation of a French term for somebody who obsesses over something they can't have.

I think it's referring to "leche vitrine" which is like saying window shopping in French but which translates literally to something like "window licking". I think it's supposed to have an ambiguous double meaning with the short bus English version...

 

edit: so this would make sense with the all the sexual references in the song and video, yeah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.