oscillik Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 only pitchfork mentioned it being (AKA manchester track), am I wrong? Didn't see official mention of it anywhere else. it's on Warp Records website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lane Visitor Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Warp mentions it. It's on Warp's website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baph Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 I believe this was mentioned on Worf's wepsite???????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest beringelab Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 exclusive track for... my ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schlitze Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 This page should just be people saying that warp mentions it on their website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olo Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 warp mentioned that on their website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhonny Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Maybe he's made changes to the Metz track for the album? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest trananhhung Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Warp mentions it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schlitze Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Warp mentions it on their website Yeah i heard about that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
korona15 Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Warp mentions it on their website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triachus Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 warp did a thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeez Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 warp says'it' on his webceit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest amnesiac Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Japan gets bonus tracks because they pay more for their music Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Jan Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 So afaik this hasn't been posted yet, but someone at FACT posted this about the artwork: Update: As pointed out by Thomas Houthave in the comments, the numbers in the cost rundown are possibly a nod to the way streaming services like Spotify are collected on digital sales reports (or, indeed, simply copied from Aphex’s royalties). Pretty interesting (or was this blatantly obvious? I didn't have a clue anyway) combined with his TOR link, makes a lot of sense (isn't the Spotify logo chartreuse as well? ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 good call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andihow Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 the warp website mentions it as known as the manchester track. also, where can i preorder the japanese CD but know i'm doing it correctly because theres english text on the page? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Mughnus Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 yeah warp mentions it on their website the warp website mentions it as known as the manchester track. also, where can i preorder the japanese CD but know i'm doing it correctly because theres english text on the page? also this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manmower Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 So afaik this hasn't been posted yet, but someone at FACT posted this about the artwork: Update: As pointed out by Thomas Houthave in the comments, the numbers in the cost rundown are possibly a nod to the way streaming services like Spotify are collected on digital sales reports (or, indeed, simply copied from Aphexs royalties). Pretty interesting (or was this blatantly obvious? I didn't have a clue anyway) combined with his TOR link, makes a lot of sense (isn't the Spotify logo chartreuse as well? ) I don't really get him, what does Spotify have to do with sending out promos and organizing listening parties for instance, or am I taking the comparison too literally? Also, how does "Digitisation from tape archive copy of The Making of Windowlicker" relate to the new album, or is that just something he always wanted to do, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YEK Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 web-cite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adieu Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 .tor = nod to piracy listing royalties, expenses = record label cutting into his share of his art Don't pirate music. Fuck record labels. Independent musicians forever. just my thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest amnesiac Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 haha nevermind i'm way off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Mughnus Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 .tor = nod to piracy listing royalties, expenses = record label cutting into his share of his art Don't pirate music. Fuck record labels. Independent musicians forever. just my thoughts. Kind of in line with what he's doing with Rephlex these days... yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friendly Foil Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Yeah... no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Jan Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 So afaik this hasn't been posted yet, but someone at FACT posted this about the artwork: Update: As pointed out by Thomas Houthave in the comments, the numbers in the cost rundown are possibly a nod to the way streaming services like Spotify are collected on digital sales reports (or, indeed, simply copied from Aphexs royalties). Pretty interesting (or was this blatantly obvious? I didn't have a clue anyway) combined with his TOR link, makes a lot of sense (isn't the Spotify logo chartreuse as well? ) I don't really get him, what does Spotify have to do with sending out promos and organizing listening parties for instance, or am I taking the comparison too literally? Also, how does "Digitisation from tape archive copy of The Making of Windowlicker" relate to the new album, or is that just something he always wanted to do, lol. Amount/effort spent on promoting / pressing / making a track/video/album ≠ cash that artists receive from Spotify, at all. Good way of mocking that through this I thought. Making of Windowlicker ties in with imagining how much effort/people/cash was needed for that video and how little he gained from it since the streaming services? Something like that? Thinking out loud here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noise Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 i thought it was just all the costs involved in making/promoting/distributing etc. the product, divided by how many copies there are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.