TubularCorporation Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve really rips into the the intellectual vacuousness of JBP. The related Sam Seder interview yesterday is a great listen, too. But I'm not posting it, I'm posting this instead: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alcofribas Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve really rips into the the intellectual vacuousness of JBP. the best part of this was when Peterson tweeted the article and thought the “ad” for robinson’s parody book was real and was like “you can’t make this up folks.” lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YangYing Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve really rips into the the intellectual vacuousness of JBP. The related Sam Seder interview yesterday is a great listen, too. But I'm not posting it, I'm posting this instead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbGpnYXYlIU lol but seriously guys I bet ur rooms are just absolute filth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbpete Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve really rips into the the intellectual vacuousness of JBP. the best part of this was when Peterson tweeted the article and thought the “ad” for robinson’s parody book was real and was like “you can’t make this up folks.” lmao You mean this one ( https://www.amazon.co.uk/Blueprints-Sparkling-Tomorrow-Thoughts-Reclaiming/dp/0692479813 ) - Reading the comments I'm guessing it's a parody of Maps of Meaning et al .... Have they been warring factions for a while then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TubularCorporation Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 but seriously guys I bet ur rooms are just absolute filth No way, I've got the vertical organization. But seriously, I wonder what Peterson would say about the University of Minnesota clutter study. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YangYing Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 it comes down to either the commies or jbp are insane probably a bit of both, but better ded than red u kno ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kavinsky Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 still ambivalent about this person but i enjoyed this interview, he seems very fragile and honest on this one.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfskeOIDQMU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YangYing Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 ^that's part of the thing with all of these articles despising him(edit: and critique of him in general), he IS helping people and the method he provides works: https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201514 what alternatives do they provide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Entorwellian Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 For someone who proselytizes free speech and the importance of intellectual critique, he sure does like resorting to hate and violence when he doesn't like someone's else's speech. He is a dumb man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YangYing Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 For someone who proselytizes free speech and the importance of intellectual critique, he sure does like resorting to hate and violence when he doesn't like someone's else's speech. He is a dumb man *slaps happily* edit: and he also is a holocaust denier innit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvatorin Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPrxtj8FIQA so despite the title i think this video really shows every hole in peterson's reactionary non philosophy. wow. this one is especially bad. I almost think the title is a joke because the host doesn’t snap at all. It should be called JP circles around the question and deflects for 8 minutes. Sorry if this has been shared already, but wow. https://camestrosfelapton.wordpress.com/2018/02/28/reading-peterson-so-you-dont-have-to-part-1/ by the way, this is a very good read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usagi Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 threatening to slap someone commands respect and stabilises the discourse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auxien Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 ok but who fucking threatens to slap someone. you don't THREATEN someone with a fucking slap for christ's sake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usagi Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 the threat is a Jungian act of sublimation wherein the hand of the threatener acts as a psycho-fascistic proxy for their erect penis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KovalainenFanBoy Posted March 20, 2018 Share Posted March 20, 2018 trigger fingers turn to twitter fingers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auxien Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 the threat is a Jungian act of sublimation wherein the hand of the threatener acts as a psycho-fascistic proxy for their erect penis. couch that in 600 pages of babble and you're rich m9 trigger fingers turn to twitter fingers when tiggers had fingers who member also let's all take a gander at Peterson's imagery from that article that azatoth linked on the last page. i lolled when i got to it, was even worse than i would've guessed. such unbridled imaginative genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvatorin Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 is that for real? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qnio Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 ^that's part of the thing with all of these articles despising him(edit: and critique of him in general), he IS helping people and the method he provides works: https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201514 what alternatives do they provide? why do you think what petersen says or do is important, or useful? is he helping anyone? i mean, he's a clinical psychologist, surely in his practice he might have helped someone, but there are millions other therapists around that don't go around writing self-help books and waving around their political opinions disguised as deep philosophical and scientific insights---and repelling questions yelling 'oh i didn't said that at all' and whatnot. is helping people selling them a self-help book? if he sold billions of copies, did he helped a billion people? does a 'ye oh lord bless him his book made me see the world in a whole new light blah blah just bought two copies of his bible!' comment on youtube count as a helped people? and what do you mean with this 'providing alternatives' stuff? what alternatives, to psychotherapy? and by whom, his critics? is it even related? his 'helping method' is what, his clinical sessions? or his political shit about people---i'm sorry, individuals---being 'responsible' and keeping their shit straight (no pun intended), i mean, no shit! and telling 'young men' to blame everything on the marxists? just read that article with the 'maps of meaning' quotes... and the figures! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usagi Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPrxtj8FIQA so despite the title i think this video really shows every hole in peterson's reactionary non philosophy. wow. this one is especially bad. I almost think the title is a joke because the host doesn’t snap at all. It should be called JP circles around the question and deflects for 8 minutes. speaking of snapping nibba needs some rest instead of relentlessly spreading himself all over the globe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvatorin Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 man's ego is getting too big. if he helped Charles and the Kwakiutl people he should just chill and be humble about it. Follow your own god damn rules man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod Posted March 21, 2018 Author Share Posted March 21, 2018 i hope this guy slips on a banana peel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Member Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 LOL that illustration, how can people take him seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prdctvsm Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azatoth Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 illustrations makes me think of some timecube shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YangYing Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 ^that's part of the thing with all of these articles despising him(edit: and critique of him in general), he IS helping people and the method he provides works: https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201514 what alternatives do they provide? why do you think what petersen says or do is important, or useful? is he helping anyone? i mean, he's a clinical psychologist, surely in his practice he might have helped someone, but there are millions other therapists around that don't go around writing self-help books and waving around their political opinions disguised as deep philosophical and scientific insights---and repelling questions yelling 'oh i didn't said that at all' and whatnot. is helping people selling them a self-help book? if he sold billions of copies, did he helped a billion people? does a 'ye oh lord bless him his book made me see the world in a whole new light blah blah just bought two copies of his bible!' comment on youtube count as a helped people? and what do you mean with this 'providing alternatives' stuff? what alternatives, to psychotherapy? and by whom, his critics? is it even related? his 'helping method' is what, his clinical sessions? or his political shit about people---i'm sorry, individuals---being 'responsible' and keeping their shit straight (no pun intended), i mean, no shit! and telling 'young men' to blame everything on the marxists? just read that article with the 'maps of meaning' quotes... and the figures! the study which I linked shows that his self authoring program reduced gender and ethnic inequalities in achievement for ~1000 students in a university.. that was the 'method' I was referring to... and yes what should one do instead of setting their life straight? that was my point. I have stated before I think his views on the political climate are too extreme, altough it does apparently apply for Canada and here in Sweden. (edit: and apparently also the UK) I simply don't buy people saying that everything someone says is garbage.. go find out for yourself.. agree some disagree some Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.