Jump to content
IGNORED

Now That Trump's President... (not any more!)


Nebraska

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Nebraska said:
damn that didn't last. now those caravans of illegals will just spill through with guns and drugs #MAGA #AmerikkkaFirst

well, they can always just go under donnie's stupid wall anyway...

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/longest-ever-smuggling-tunnel-found-southwest-border-n1126571

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised Donnie hasn't tried to travel ban China yet

maybe an outbreak at mar-a-lago would change that

unless more Chinese deals are to be made

Then we're all expendable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zero said:

Surprised Donnie hasn't tried to travel ban China yet

maybe an outbreak at mar-a-lago would change that

unless more Chinese deals are to be made

Then we're all expendable

Trump saw your post:

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/china-travel-advisory.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, zero said:

Surprised Donnie hasn't tried to travel ban China yet

maybe an outbreak at mar-a-lago would change that

unless more Chinese deals are to be made

Then we're all expendable

he's supposedly going to add a couple of countries to the travel ban soon so "hold onto your butts"

also:

Quote

WASHINGTON — Sen. Lisa Murkowski announced Friday she will vote no to hearing from witnesses in President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, likely dooming Democrats' hopes of hearing testimony from witnesses with firsthand knowledge of why Trump ordered almost $400 million in aid to Ukraine frozen.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry/gop-sen-murkowski-says-she-will-vote-against-witnesses-calls-n1127381

i hope pelosi's got a back up plan coz the mitch has been obviously putting in overtime on this cover up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Nebraska said:
15 hours ago, zero said:

Surprised Donnie hasn't tried to travel ban China yet

maybe an outbreak at mar-a-lago would change that

unless more Chinese deals are to be made

Then we're all expendable

he's supposedly going to add a couple of countries to the travel ban soon so "hold onto your butts"

 

Wow, the balls to state the following:

Quote

 

The White House didn’t immediately return a request for comment. Spokesman Hogan Gidley last week defended the original order in a statement.

“The travel ban has been profoundly successful in protecting our country and raising the security baseline around the world,” he said.

 

Yeah cause all those Burmese are planning to do harm to the US. Fucking nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2020 at 8:20 PM, Nebraska said:

damn that didn't last. now those caravans of illegals will just spill through with guns and drugs #MAGA #AmerikkkaFirst

Best wall.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

murkoski voted against new witnesses. lamar alexander too, but his statement conceded the alleged conduct occurred. he reasoned that, because there was not bipartisan support for impeachment, the charges don't merrit conviction. witness vote failed 51-49.

so no bolton in the senate, but he is free to do an interview in the next few days. he liked a tweet suggesting this idea, so maybe that's possible.

now in the trial there still remains closing arguments on monday and then the final vote on wednesday. 

senator alexander's statement conceding the conduct alleged by the House impeachment managers is interesting. other gop senator statements had similar language. mulvaney knew the final messaging - we did it, get over it. that's the senate gop argument now. trump did it, but they don't want to remove him from office. at least the House managers accomplished that. 

the arguments against conviction don't stand up, and the arguments for conviction are strong. but the senate gop are pretty self-interested and their big factors are

  • polling for trump support in their home states
  • staying in the graces of their party
Edited by very honest
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they couldn't remove Clinton from office for something he definitely did do (lying under oath), then there's no way they're going to remove Chump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just gonna refer to this sham of a trial as Turtlegate until someone else comes up with a better name. Because McConnell.

At least this would give more ammo to whomever the Dem front runner ends up being, as the general public gets closer to casting votes.

Edited by ambergonk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2020 at 11:41 PM, Braintree said:

If they couldn't remove Clinton from office for something he definitely did do (lying under oath), then there's no way they're going to remove Chump.

There was never any chance he would be removed, but denying tax paying citizens the right to hear evidence and testimony regarding conduct of their POTUS will stand for a long time in history.  What a bullshit circus.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, auxien said:

honestly not sure this video is real. looks WAY too blurry and fucked up.

Definitely fake, if you have some experience with these things you can tell the football is added in post.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.