Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good got.. it's 2+ hours long. i don't know if i can take that much kermit the frog. 

 

we need 10 hours of "i'm already eating from the traschan"

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jordan peterson sounds like someone is blowing up a balloon inside his ass every time he opens his mouth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like them both. Thnx darre

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"But Dr. Zizek's analysis was so complicated it was difficult for me to follow"

 

- Jordan Peterson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey look, it's another hours long debate with audio issues. This was supposed to be the match of the century :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

The thing I've realised about Peterson is that as much as he's a compelling speaker, I just find his approach unnecesarily agressive. Just not to my taste I suppose :) I feel if he was a little less intense he'd chime with more people.

Edited by Polytrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing I've realised about Peterson is that as much as he's a compelling speaker, I just find his approach unnecesarily agressive. Just not to my taste I suppose :) I feel if he was a little less intense he'd chime with more people.

I guess you have to be a bit aggressive if you’re out of your element intellectually and your target audience is right leaning dumbasses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread used to be longer, who member?

 

Love and light :^)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing I've realised about Peterson is that as much as he's a compelling speaker, I just find his approach unnecesarily agressive. Just not to my taste I suppose :) I feel if he was a little less intense he'd chime with more people.

Agree. His intro argument was unbearable to watch. And just skipped it after 5 mins of his pseudo philosophic meandering. As it felt like it was going nowhere. Enjoyed Zizeks opening argument better. He was more to the point. And seemed better prepared. Peterson, again, was going into his familiar anti-Marx schtick. I think I like him more if he's in discussion with politicians. I guess because the average politician is worse at pretending to know what they are talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peterson was in no way prepared for this debate and I don't think he's even read Marx or anything on marxism. He was just straw-manning and got beat by said straw-man by a guy who lives in a dumpster behind the university. A real philosopher vs a charlatan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

2 hours of mind numbing scrambled egg slow cooking.

jordan peterson is redefining what it means to be an incomprehensible mouth frothing rambling idiot, followed by claps and applause.

Edited by bitchroast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread used to be longer, who member?

 

Love and light :^)

 

I member

2 hours of mind numbing scrambled egg slow cooking.

jordan peterson is redefining what it means to be an incomprehensible mouth frothing rambling idiot, followed by claps and applause.

 

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

do not forget, the famous bet.
time stamped at 1:19:25 www.youtube.com/watch?v=78BFFq_8XvM&feature=youtu.be&t=4765

Edited by bitchroast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

peterson's writings and rantings remind me of when i was forced to do communications subjects at uni and had to reach that 3k word limit and sound smarter than I am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JP can sound reasonable when he stays in his lane as a psychologist. When he tries stuff like this, it’s like watching a field mouse get eaten by an owl. Maybe this is his way of tapping out, since he’s probably been a tool of Prager U and the Heritage Foundation for a couple years, which does seem bloody demanding. It’s a dragon of chaos!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peterson was in no way prepared for this debate and I don't think he's even read Marx or anything on marxism. He was just straw-manning and got beat by said straw-man by a guy who lives in a dumpster behind the university. A real philosopher vs a charlatan.

The most accurate description of Zizek I’ve ever heard.

 

As to Peterson prepping for a debate by reading something on the topic, I feel like that would be a complete break from his MO.

Maybe he read the wiki page?

This thread used to be longer, who member?

 

Love and light :^)

I member.

 

Live and loght. :^}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

maybe he read the rationalwiki.org wiki. 

Edited by bitchroast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably a more likely source for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not again, I beg you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(this was a passive aggressive comment which meant: yes, do it! again!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no I'm serious.. like there's not much left to say about papa peterson imo

 

 

or I'm not liking the prospect of being the only defense on peterson on this thread again..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry Mix, Usagi quit WATMM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's sad I would've liked to clarify some stuff :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Jordan Peterson. 

Edited by bitchroast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...