ignatius 22 Posted April 22 good got.. it's 2+ hours long. i don't know if i can take that much kermit the frog. we need 10 hours of "i'm already eating from the traschan" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chronical 34 Posted April 22 jordan peterson sounds like someone is blowing up a balloon inside his ass every time he opens his mouth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DavieAddison 2 Posted April 22 "But Dr. Zizek's analysis was so complicated it was difficult for me to follow" - Jordan Peterson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
user 16 Posted April 22 Hey look, it's another hours long debate with audio issues. This was supposed to be the match of the century :( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Polytrix 0 Posted April 22 (edited) The thing I've realised about Peterson is that as much as he's a compelling speaker, I just find his approach unnecesarily agressive. Just not to my taste I suppose :) I feel if he was a little less intense he'd chime with more people. Edited April 22 by Polytrix Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DavieAddison 2 Posted April 22 The thing I've realised about Peterson is that as much as he's a compelling speaker, I just find his approach unnecesarily agressive. Just not to my taste I suppose :) I feel if he was a little less intense he'd chime with more people. I guess you have to be a bit aggressive if you’re out of your element intellectually and your target audience is right leaning dumbasses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hello spiral 69 Posted April 22 This thread used to be longer, who member? Love and light :^) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goDel 21 Posted April 23 The thing I've realised about Peterson is that as much as he's a compelling speaker, I just find his approach unnecesarily agressive. Just not to my taste I suppose :) I feel if he was a little less intense he'd chime with more people. Agree. His intro argument was unbearable to watch. And just skipped it after 5 mins of his pseudo philosophic meandering. As it felt like it was going nowhere. Enjoyed Zizeks opening argument better. He was more to the point. And seemed better prepared. Peterson, again, was going into his familiar anti-Marx schtick. I think I like him more if he's in discussion with politicians. I guess because the average politician is worse at pretending to know what they are talking about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azatoth 2 Posted April 23 Peterson was in no way prepared for this debate and I don't think he's even read Marx or anything on marxism. He was just straw-manning and got beat by said straw-man by a guy who lives in a dumpster behind the university. A real philosopher vs a charlatan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bitchroast 23 Posted April 23 (edited) 2 hours of mind numbing scrambled egg slow cooking. jordan peterson is redefining what it means to be an incomprehensible mouth frothing rambling idiot, followed by claps and applause. Edited April 23 by bitchroast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StephenG 33 Posted April 23 This thread used to be longer, who member? Love and light :^) I member 2 hours of mind numbing scrambled egg slow cooking. jordan peterson is redefining what it means to be an incomprehensible mouth frothing rambling idiot, followed by claps and applause. +1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bitchroast 23 Posted April 23 (edited) do not forget, the famous bet.time stamped at 1:19:25 www.youtube.com/watch?v=78BFFq_8XvM&feature=youtu.be&t=4765 Edited April 23 by bitchroast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mesh Gear Fox 1 Posted April 23 peterson's writings and rantings remind me of when i was forced to do communications subjects at uni and had to reach that 3k word limit and sound smarter than I am. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Candiru 15 Posted April 23 JP can sound reasonable when he stays in his lane as a psychologist. When he tries stuff like this, it’s like watching a field mouse get eaten by an owl. Maybe this is his way of tapping out, since he’s probably been a tool of Prager U and the Heritage Foundation for a couple years, which does seem bloody demanding. It’s a dragon of chaos! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chenGOD 12 Posted April 23 Peterson was in no way prepared for this debate and I don't think he's even read Marx or anything on marxism. He was just straw-manning and got beat by said straw-man by a guy who lives in a dumpster behind the university. A real philosopher vs a charlatan. The most accurate description of Zizek I’ve ever heard. As to Peterson prepping for a debate by reading something on the topic, I feel like that would be a complete break from his MO. Maybe he read the wiki page? This thread used to be longer, who member? Love and light :^) I member. Live and loght. :^} Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bitchroast 23 Posted April 23 (edited) maybe he read the rationalwiki.org wiki. Edited April 23 by bitchroast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chenGOD 12 Posted April 23 Probably a more likely source for him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goDel 21 Posted April 23 (this was a passive aggressive comment which meant: yes, do it! again!) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MIXL2 17 Posted April 23 no I'm serious.. like there's not much left to say about papa peterson imo or I'm not liking the prospect of being the only defense on peterson on this thread again.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stickfigger 9 Posted April 23 Don't worry Mix, Usagi quit WATMM Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MIXL2 17 Posted April 23 that's sad I would've liked to clarify some stuff :( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bitchroast 23 Posted April 23 (edited) Jordan Peterson. Edited April 23 by bitchroast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
