Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Very cool, hadn't heard about that.

 

The most interesting part was in a mere 40,000 years they'll be nearing stars in constellations!?! I mean it makes sense but I guess I never thought about them actually coming even remotely close to anything ever again. That is, if they don't get intercepted before then... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

when i learned that new horizons would find some kuiper belt object to check out after pluto, i figured it wouldn't likely happen to be a very close fly-by. with the recent announcements about how it will be new years day 2019, i looked into how close the fly-by will be, and it will be 3 times closer than the fly-by with pluto! 

 

the photos from the fly-by with pluto are some of the best space photos.

 

hype

Edited by very honest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Voyager I fires up trajectory correction thrusters for first time in 37 years.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/01/us/voyager-1-thrusters-fired-first-time-since-1980/index.html

i feel so dumb sometimes reading these news... :facepalm: first they say they'll be able to extend the life of the spacecraft by 2 or 3 years and then they say that in approximately 40.000 years the same spacecraft will be reaching an obscure star... i don't get it... which one is it? what do they mean by extending the life of the spacecraft?

 

"With these thrusters that are still functional after 37 years without use, we will be able to extend the life of the Voyager 1 spacecraft by two to three years."

 

"It is expected that in the year 40,272, Voyager 1 will come within 1.7 light years of an obscure star in the constellation Ursa Minor (the Little Bear or Little Dipper)."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Voyager I fires up trajectory correction thrusters for first time in 37 years.

 

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/01/us/voyager-1-thrusters-fired-first-time-since-1980/index.html

i feel so dumb sometimes reading these news... :facepalm: first they say they'll be able to extend the life of the spacecraft by 2 or 3 years and then they say that in approximately 40.000 years the same spacecraft will be reaching an obscure star... i don't get it... which one is it? what do they mean by extending the life of the spacecraft?

 

"With these thrusters that are still functional after 37 years without use, we will be able to extend the life of the Voyager 1 spacecraft by two to three years."

 

"It is expected that in the year 40,272, Voyager 1 will come within 1.7 light years of an obscure star in the constellation Ursa Minor (the Little Bear or Little Dipper)."

 

 

It only needs boosters if it somehow falls off course. It doesn't need to burn fuel to go forward, since there isn't enough gravity in deep space to slow it down. Over a long enough timeline, what little gravity (and space weather) there is may send it off course and it uses the boosters to correct its trajectory.

 

They calculate it to come within 1.7 light years of that star because over that period of time something will inevitably fuck up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It only needs boosters if it somehow falls off course. It doesn't need to burn fuel to go forward, since there isn't enough gravity in deep space to slow it down. Over a long enough timeline, what little gravity (and space weather) there is may send it off course and it uses the boosters to correct its trajectory.

They calculate it to come within 1.7 light years of that star because over that period of time something will inevitably fuck up.

so when they say that they'll be able to extend its life by 2 or 3 years what they really mean is that they'll be able to control it, firing up its trajectory correction thrusters, for more 2 or 3 years, is that it? after that, it stays adrift, right? Edited by THIS IS MICHAEL JACKSON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thrusters are just used to keep the antenna oriented back to earth.

"With these thrusters that are still functional after 37 years without use, we will be able to extend the life of the Voyager 1 spacecraft by two to three years."

 

so what do they mean by extend the life of said spacecraft? extend the period of time in which they'll be able to maintain the antenna oriented back to earth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it falls off course we won't be able to receive the data. "Extend the life" just means we'll be able to receive data from it. Otherwise it's useless, since it's never coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it falls off course we won't be able to receive the data. "Extend the life" just means we'll be able to receive data from it. Otherwise it's useless, since it's never coming back.

thank god i finally understood it, thanks for your patience, i truly mean it, i know i can be a pain in the ass sometimes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.