Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mlon said:

No, it's a stumbling cheap and overrated mess sadly.

It is too intense and crazy! 

If they could just keep that dark atmospheric vibe and do more of the creepy weird exploring of the book then it would be perfect. 
I don't want it to turn into a zombie gore slasher movie 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, cruising for burgers said:

what if it is a gay zombie gore slasher movie?

Yeah if you get bitten by those you will be spamming the forum with more hardcore gay music you like: Taylor Swift, mgmt and Coldplay 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was a little bit sick this weekend so watched a bunch of movies. I did an Oppenheimer and American Psycho double feature on Saturday, very nice and fun pairing.

Saw Oppenheimer in theaters and enjoyed it, watched it this time on a laptop, and the sound design and sound mixing were much better (more balanced) surprisingly on the laptop. The musical soundtrack was still not my cup of tea. In the theaters it seemed like the dialogue and soundtrack were sometimes competing for prominence in a way that muddled both. The soundtrack was kind of Hans Zimmer inspired, and there were moments when it worked well (like in the final shot of the movie), but I felt like the soundtrack lent itself at times to cheapening or turning into cliches some of the character interactions; additionally, the film is so dialogue heavy, and Nolan chose to use the soundtrack to try and generate suspense and to highlight the emotions of characters during heated exchanges in a way that seemed amateurish.

Nolan did a lot of interviews when the film came out, and I watched probably most of them and was very struck by his insistence regarding the naive nature of these scientists who created the atomic bomb. Oppenheimer in particular thought that he would have say in how it was used, and other prominent scientists told him that the weapon would be 'the bomb that ended all war, that secured peace' - lmao, the peace bomb!

Anyway, I really liked Oppenheimer overall in spite of the soundtrack missteps. Because I was watching it on a laptop and had control over the playback, I ended up watching this scene multiple times. It reminded me of the pure originality of the earliest filmmakers from around the globe at the advent of film, making up the rules as they went along, and it also made me think of Nolan in the same breath as Lynch and Malick in terms of stylistic exuberance:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, decibal cooper said:

Was a little bit sick this weekend so watched a bunch of movies. I did an Oppenheimer and American Psycho double feature on Saturday, very nice and fun pairing.

Saw Oppenheimer in theaters and enjoyed it, watched it this time on a laptop, and the sound design and sound mixing were much better (more balanced) surprisingly on the laptop. The musical soundtrack was still not my cup of tea. In the theaters it seemed like the dialogue and soundtrack were sometimes competing for prominence in a way that muddled both. The soundtrack was kind of Hans Zimmer inspired, and there were moments when it worked well (like in the final shot of the movie), but I felt like the soundtrack lent itself at times to cheapening or turning into cliches some of the character interactions; additionally, the film is so dialogue heavy, and Nolan chose to use the soundtrack to try and generate suspense and to highlight the emotions of characters during heated exchanges in a way that seemed amateurish.

Nolan did a lot of interviews when the film came out, and I watched probably most of them and was very struck by his insistence regarding the naive nature of these scientists who created the atomic bomb. Oppenheimer in particular thought that he would have say in how it was used, and other prominent scientists told him that the weapon would be 'the bomb that ended all war, that secured peace' - lmao, the peace bomb!

Anyway, I really liked Oppenheimer overall in spite of the soundtrack missteps. Because I was watching it on a laptop and had control over the playback, I ended up watching this scene multiple times. It reminded me of the pure originality of the earliest filmmakers from around the globe at the advent of film, making up the rules as they went along, and it also made me think of Nolan in the same breath as Lynch and Malick in terms of stylistic exuberance:

 

Did you pick up on the connections to TENET and Interstellar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, decibal cooper said:

had not thought about it, but I have seen both of those - curious what you mean?

There is a theory that Nolan's 3 films form a loose "physics trilogy"; one set in the past, one in the present, and one in the future. Oppenheimer lays out the prevailing theories and personas involved, and mentions Oppy's theoretical work relating to black holes, that he left to work on the bomb. TENET executes theories related to time travel and causality, and in one scene, discusses Oppenheimer's fear of igniting the atmosphere with an atomic or nuclear explosion. Interstellar displays the effects of Einstein's relativity on human existence, and they mention him in the dialogue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's a trailer for this new Alex Garland A24 joint called Civil War which has racked up >1m views in 10 hours. it's giving me all the wrong sorts of vibes, feels very pornographic. idk about making a movie with this subject matter rn and presenting it this way. even the title is so on the nose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw Maestro last night. It was actually incredible. People are going throw all the awards at it, but they are earned. It’s not a traditional biopic, which is a big relief. I normally don’t like Bradley Cooper but he made a hell of a movie. A great movie for musicians to watch, as well. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garland's Civil War looks shite. Boo. 1/10. We're doing trailer reviews now, deal with it.

Edited by Silent Member
  • Haha 2
  • Farnsworth 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Silent Member said:

Garland's Civil War looks shite. Boo. 1/10. We're doing trailer reviews now, deal with it.

 it's like someone at A24 said "we have to show people we're not just arthouse wankers, time for something big and dumb". I was reminded of 90s disaster movies.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, usagi said:

yeah, I really don't like Cradley Booper.

I agree. Something about his brand of leading man is so overconfident, plastic and boring.

Tho I think what work’s about Maestro & A Star Is Born is that his characters in both aren’t necessarily likable. I genuinely liked both quite a lot and couldn’t really stand any of his other films. 

 

 

Loved Barbie 

👇

@cern

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.