Jump to content

Recommended Posts

 

 

Watched the classic 'Blade runner' last night. It was a huge let down, nothing really new in it.

*Watches 30 year old film, wonders why there isn't anything new in it*

 

:cerious: Feels stupid. Well, it was so praised and all. I had good faith for the movie, but halfway of it, you really knew what was going to happen. The plot was boring, there was nothing new. Well I guess it can't be helped, cos it's an oldie.

 

Blade Runner and Syd Mead's design is iconic and spawned iterations of it for a multitude of movies, books and games. Visually it's a stunning movie and still the themes presented in the movie I don't think have been explored that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inherent Vice 7/10

 

I'm a big fan of PTA. There Will Be Blood is on my Top 3.

I knew going in that it was going to be a chaotic story and wouldn't make that much sense, but unlike the rest of his movies I didn't care about this one one bit and I haven't given it a thought since I watched it last night. It seems more like an experiment to see if he can still make a movie which is rich on characters even though each character has about 4 minutes of screentime.

Anyway, it didn't do it for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can TWBB find its way into your top-3? It wouldnt even get into my top-250.

 

Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, Fellini, Bergman, Lynch, Scorsese, Welles, Polanski, Meville, Herzog, Loach, Hitchcock, Coppola, LVT, Lang, R Scott, D Lean = real cinema.

 

Compared to IV, There Will Be Blood is a bloated piece & DD-Lewis looming large isnt enough to carry the story imho. As for the The Master = complete shambles. Paul T.T.T.Trouble Anderson (sorry i couldnt resist that insipid early 90's garage-house reference) seems better equipped and to have really matured with Inherent Vice, where the feel of ending eras/stoned fug of Sportello's perspective/cinematography/performances really come together to do justice to Pychon's writing.

 

,,,,,and how anyone can diss Blade Runner is beyond,,,,,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, Fellini, Bergman, Lynch, Scorsese, Welles, Polanski, Meville, Herzog, Loach, Hitchcock, Coppola, LVT, Lang, R Scott, D Lean = real cinema.

oh piss off

 

coming from someone who loves every single one of those directors, just please piss off with the whole "real cinema" bullshit. there is no elite group of "real filmmakers" - there are thousands of amazing films and filmmakers, and everyone has their own opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enemy - 8/10 - really great art direction and cinematography. jake gyllahoolio was excellent. really loved this film but have no desire to watch it again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Watched Birdman, fine film and all but the next day I realized it's a watered down, version of synecdoche, New York.

 

An interesting comparison. I thought Birdman was so-so but Synecdoche, New York was outstanding! It's one of my favourite films and rarely gets the recognition it deserves.

 

 

The similarities are too much, same overall theme, same location, both protagonists putting together a play, both struggling with reality...

 

I started thinking that birdman is a much more calculated film, depurated for success and award winning, I was thinking about the 'looks-as-one-take' gimmick, whether is has a purpose or not, and I'm probably reaching here but it kinda achieves the feeling that what we are watching is a play, a play about a man doing a play which would be another Kaufmanesque thing to do, or maybe it's just meant as another thing that film buffs get to praise. I think Synecdoche is much much more profound and has more meaning whereas Birdman uses tricks and tropes to simulate it (the meaning and message), that as a whole they do not really meld together.

 

Still, birdman is great, it may be a masterpiece of calculated film making, and lingers in your mind days after you've seen it, even if it's only to figure out how much it borrows from synecdoche. I need to watch synecdoche again.

 

And I don't think any of this should substract form bridman but that as you say, it should add to the appreciation of synecdoche.

Edited by GORDO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, Fellini, Bergman, Lynch, Scorsese, Welles, Polanski, Meville, Herzog, Loach, Hitchcock, Coppola, LVT, Lang, R Scott, D Lean = real cinema.

oh piss off

 

coming from someone who loves every single one of those directors, just please piss off with the whole "real cinema" bullshit. there is no elite group of "real filmmakers" - there are thousands of amazing films and filmmakers, and everyone has their own opinions.

 

 

Its not a case of high/low culture or elitism, its about plain fuckin quality, so piss off yerself mate.

 

There's "art" and there's There Will Be Blood......and as an open forum i'll express whatever opinion on a movie i choose to.

 

If you want to be a prissy cock, crack on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Starry_Eyes_2014_film_poster.jpg

This was impressive, but the horror aspect is kinda overshadowed by the brilliantly scathing dissection of the loathsome hipster schtick. An actress who would do anything to get to the big time goes for a couple of auditions with some otherwordly producers who send her mind wandering into the sky about the possibilty of getting the lead in their upcoming horror film 'The Silver Scream' and break free of the hipsters who she feels are holding her back. The reality is she serves burgers and fries at a resturant and hangs out with some real ironic self absorbed doucebags who, in true hipster fashion believe that they're part of the film world too. We're introduced to them at a party where one of them is talking Poe lyrics over an electropop beat. They spend their days sitting around around taking photos with retro camera's and talking about non-existent scripts they have in the pipeline, it starts to grind down the aspiring actress, after a couple of successful auditions inspired by positive feedback from the casting agent she quits her waitress job only to come crawling back, where the tolerant boss (Pat Healy) tells her ''Look, i know we're not self aware and ironic enough for you, but this is my thing, do you want to be part of that?''. Depressed to be back where she started, she talks to the loser from the party who said he had a script, she meets him at his defunct RV which he lives in (it has a little library inside and a couch outside on a path) and they agree over ecstacy that she'll star in his film, knowing that he's a boring cliche with thick rimmed glasses a showreel like a pile of used toilet roll. Having previously being warned by the producer of 'The Silver Scream' that hipsters are talentless nobodies who sit around talking about doing things and try to make people believe they are part of something they're not and will never amount to anything apart from their shit part time jobs, she finds herself at a crossroads, does she make a sacrifice? Or does she stay hip?

 

this was alright. I dunno, I may appreciate it more with another viewing, I'm pretty tired and my brain isn't really functioning right now. I didn't like it when

 

 

it went all Contracted and her body started falling apart. meh. but it fit into a bigger plot device, so ok.

 

 

cool soundtrack. lead actress is cute and talented, hope to see more of her. the violence was super-effective because the build up to it was so slow and deliberate and I didn't really think it was going to go that way.

 

all-in-all, a p deece horror flick. I don't agree about the commentary on hipsters overshadowing the horror, your writeup makes it sound like an episode of Nathan Barley or something.

 

Glad you checked it out, usagi :biggrin: I think my hipster evaluation must have clouded your mind before you watched it and you went in expectin a barley. The hipster shit wasn't something that occurred to me until a day later when i was thinkin about it. I guess i overthought it a bit when i wrote the review...Mmmm.

Spoiler tags on every film review from this day forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compliance

A scam caller posing as a police officer persuades the staff of a fast food restaurant to strip search and antagonize an employee under false claims of theft. Amazingly enough it was based on actual events http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strip_search_phone_call_scam

 

Paperhouse

Well made little late 80s gem from the director of Candyman. About a young girl who creates a fantasy world through drawings. Nice imagery and score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compliance

A scam caller posing as a police officer persuades the staff of a fast food restaurant to strip search and antagonize an employee under false claims of theft. Amazingly enough it was based on actual events http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strip_search_phone_call_scam

Yeah thats a creepy film, especially when the guy on the other end of the phone is revealed and you get a glimpse into Pat Healy's world*

 

 

*Can i get some spoiler tags up in this bitch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, Fellini, Bergman, Lynch, Scorsese, Welles, Polanski, Meville, Herzog, Loach, Hitchcock, Coppola, LVT, Lang, R Scott, D Lean = real cinema.

lol, wtf is this mainstream bullshit?

 

torkin, brown, teller brothers, anotelli, de luove, crinderson, bo-wai, ölsen - now that's real Cinema with a big C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mainstream bs? timeless classics....i can pick specifics and have done thru this thread but you already know them ;)

 

add Kobayashi, Shepitko, Antonioni (Red Desert/Passenger especially), Miike, Klimov, Kusturica, Bunuel,,,,,,,

 

more mainstream bs or simply rrrrrrrockin cinema? c'mon, you know thats not highfalutin bunk Eugene


its a war of c-words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the earlier directorial stuff is so influential and comparable to specific albums that inspire,,,,,, eg: Awesome Welles/Citizen Kane.....the long-tracking shot that actually takes you through the sign Scorsese picks out as a benchmark in one of his guides. Slag that off all you want, but i must've seen that film 20+times and never get bored of it.

 

Umberto D. is a must watch (especially if anyone around you is elderly it'll bring plenty of lumps to throats). The old fella and his dog are so fuckin sad but cool, brilliant stuff.

 

More classics boy? Fuck aye - The Leopard, The Night Porter, The Conformist, The American Friend, Death In Venice, Performance, the original Wicker Man (Robin Hardy when Britain still managed to make transgressive films)

 

Scorsese's Personal Journey Through doc is a must watch.....just for the catalog of genius that was New American Cinema in the early 70's....the absolute antithesis of mainstream bs

 

I got Franco's Venus in Furs and The Demons for the rest of Le Weekend, but Val's Day might put a dent in that plan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Eugene is trolling, I don't recognize any of those names.

lol noob. everyone's heard of Crinderson's Grand Bucharest Motel. leave real cinema to the cinephiles, mate.

Edited by usagi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

leave real cinema to the cinephiles, mate.

 

 

 

its like anything in life, sometimes yer in the mood for a beer/Guinness, other times you might push the boat out on a decent bourbon, or you might pick your way through a lush Burgundy..........but some nights after a long day @ work a dose of crash-bang-wallop couldnt be more appropriate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.